View Single Post
Posts: 2,225 | Thanked: 3,822 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ Florida
#14
Would've responded in half the time, except I lost my post because the geniuses designing firefox (and all browsers, really) manage to come up with keyboard shortcuts for Back and Forward that are way too easy to accidentally hit while typing.

Originally Posted by knuthf View Post
Read another thread here that describes the IC and charging software. There are even 2 patches that has not been modified for new batteries.
I was hoping you knew where that thread was, but that's fine, I'm sure I'll be able to find it once I have the time to search for it (assuming it exists, but I like to give people benefit of the doubt, and what you said is within realm of likely possibilities).

Originally Posted by knuthf
Dr-Frosk-dk use separate chargers and test the batteries with special hardware and software.
I know, and have no idea why you think that modifies what I said at all.

Originally Posted by knuthf
When the N900 was released, the capacity for the rechargeble AA batteries were 1200mA. I recently bought rechargeable AA batteries with 2700mA.
AA batteries? I am confused by you using this term, because at least among lay-persons, AA battery refers to those absurdly common cylindrical batteries. Is that what you're talking about? If so, then I have no idea what bearing it has to do on this. If you're talking about N900 batteries, then I have no idea why you called them "AA batteries". Is there some technical battery-specialist term I am unaware of here?

Originally Posted by knuthf
Read Dr-Frosk-dk properly, and not just what you want to read.
Hah, I would love to know what you think it was that I "wanted to read".

There's a pretty simple fact that is found in the first post, and requires no wanting, to find: most third party batteries inflated their numbers, and the ones claiming to be in the 2000+mAh levels, were often the ones with atrocious real capacity. Moral of the story: battery manufacturers often lie about their battery capacities.

That is the ONLY fact that is relevant to my claim that I don't consider it reasonable to trust a battery manufacturer until their battery has been tested. By all means, explain to my how anything else said in dr_frost_dk's work negates that general point (note, that if you understood my post, you'd know I didn't say that it was impossible for the battery in the original post to be 2450mAh or whatever, just that I would find that claim untrustworthy from an unknown battery manufacturer).

Originally Posted by knuthf
If you disregard the price, and willing to pay the 10A battery for the N900 is fully possible, so be very careful with claims,
I'm not the one that has made any claims, really, aside from "battery manufacturers often lie about what their battery capacities are", which is pretty much a documented reality.

Nor did I say anything at all about the possibility of a "10A" battery for the N900 - so I'm not sure where you got that from. My initial post contained two things: A. I wanted to know where you got the 1280/1290mAh (you stated both numbers, not sure if typo, or what) charging cap number, and (completely unrelated) B. I don't recommend trusting the battery manufacturer to report the accurate maximum capacity.

Last edited by Mentalist Traceur; 2012-10-06 at 04:06. Reason: guy posting before me pointed out it's mAh and not mA. Thank you.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Mentalist Traceur For This Useful Post: