View Single Post
Posts: 256 | Thanked: 110 times | Joined on Jan 2012 @ Europe
#19
Originally Posted by ladoga View Post
but if you had read my message you'd probably realize that I wasn't arguing against that at all.
Don't patronize me (especially as you are not really making much sense).

Originally Posted by ladoga View Post
What I was saying is that it's possible to have CPU spend more time idling at low frequency/voltage by using relatively higher frequencies when necessary.
As said, this doesn't work like that. A cpu running OCed for a moment will consume more energy than running balance for a longer while for what it's optimized by design. Go ahead, oveclock and measure this. (you can alternatively remain stubborn, I approve).
__________________
NOKIA N9 16GB BLACK

Last edited by DarkSkies; 2012-10-08 at 01:54.