View Single Post
Posts: 1,397 | Thanked: 2,126 times | Joined on Nov 2009 @ Dublin, Ireland
#68
Originally Posted by lma View Post
In light of recent events, there's this little bit which I didn't pay attention to before but could become significant now:



Could you elaborate on the intent behind this? At first sight it looks like a loophole for inserting unelected directors via the back door, but perhaps I'm misreading it.
Maybe it would be better to specify that the next candidate with more number of votes might be able to access to Board if a majority of Board agrees.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ivgalvez For This Useful Post: