View Single Post
Posts: 322 | Thanked: 218 times | Joined on Feb 2012
#593
Originally Posted by uTMY View Post
I merely matched Speccs assertion that was presented with a complete lack of corroborative evidence with an equivalent and opposite position.

Completely unsurprisingly Specc then resorted to juvenile name calling and was also incorrect in claiming that my response was not a dispute.

It was.

rgds

oh, that and also that I was right.
Bla bla bla. When it sounds like a troll, smells like a troll, looks like a troll - it definitely is a troll. If I am a troll (or not) has nothing to do with it.