View Single Post
Posts: 207 | Thanked: 154 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#866
Originally Posted by switch-hitter View Post
Saying a company is struggling to compete is a completely different thing to saying a company 'exists exclusively to make the Android ecosystem viable'. The latter is nonsense.
From practical point of view it's not far from thruth. Now, there's Samsung, and without the lesser non-profit brands you could say that all the fruit from Googles effort in creating and enhancing Android go directly to Samsung's pocket. How viable of an ecosystem would that be really? Those near-extinct brands are very important for Samsung.