Of course my video files play back smoothly with Video Convert! It bloomingly encodes them at 400x240. And I can vouch for the fact that higher resolutions do make a difference, even on a smaller screen; more detail is always visible. I do get your point about smaller file sizes, but in this context it is false: I want to be able to choose between quality and size, which is something I cannot do on the Itablet. Not skipping, rather the annoying gap between files. Especially when playing albums like Pink Floyd's "the Wall". Yeah, it would be nice, wouldn't it? Too bad Nokia couldn't be bothered to do a decent follow-up. What??!! Why should I? I paid them money instead. My gratitude goes to the people who -- these days almost despite of Nokia! -- managed to turn a half-finished product into something useful. Again, I really don't care how much trouble this all is or isn't for Nokia. THEY GET PAID!!! I care about the trouble people who don't get paid have gone through, many of whom are regulars on this forum. Considering how they are apparently managing it, I consider Nokia giant fools for continuing this project. That "probably" is telling... So your argument is basically: The Itablet may stink, but Vista stinks more, so it's okay? It's not even close by a long shot. Not that that is necessarily a bad thing, mind you: The Newton was all about integration and extreme hardware closedness. It had the most beautiful pen-centric OS/UI that ever existed, but its connectivity -- well, you couldn't say that it sucked, because it practically didn't have any. Exactly in what respect (provided the drivers would all made available) would that make any difference to the community? Or, in other words: What added value do we get from Nokia, apart from the hardware itself? True. Bricks can be used in houses. They have value.