Thread: Restructuring the forum
View Single Post
jalyst is offline jalyst
2013-01-23 , 14:36
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#31
It's not the "popular opinion", never has been, but I personally see it as (potentially) the best direction longer-term (approx. by 1yr from now).
Having said that, I'm fine with keeping domain/site_name as is, so long as there's been a robust discussion that comes to the conclusion that it's the optimal approach LT.
A discussion that has plenty "for" and "against" arguments, and sees a majority of folks arguing for, & voting for, the status-quo.
It's way too early to be at the point where we have that discussion, which is what I've been alluding too since my very 1st post on this.
Then there's the fact that such a discussion isn't even intended for this thread, my mea culpa for injecting it into this one...
What I find odd, is opinions that want to rule-out such conceptions, long before we're even at a point where we can make reasonable assessments.

Edit: You have edited your post to add more so I'll just answer to the following:
My point is simple this topic is re-structuring the forum, you said that the Board/Council have put this way above changing domain name... Changing domain name when things are still on-going here well seems not sensible to me... Like all wise men say never say never so I have never and will never refuse an informed discussion about it but that discussion to be held currently is pointless considering the circumstances... A sensible discussion would be around re-structuring the forum not the changing of domain at this point of time and at least for the next 6 months IMO...
100% agreed.
Last edited by jalyst; 2013-01-23 at 14:57.