Thread: Restructuring the forum
View Single Post
jalyst is offline jalyst
2013-01-26 , 07:56
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#94
I don't think there's too many more dramatically different ways one could lay-it-out, but I'd welcome layouts from others.
I do feel it's unwise not to at least include MeR derivatives at this point, once the migration has had time to settle-down ofc.

Originally Posted by qwazix View Post
The first comment, was just in favor of a simpler structure, but that's just me.
I'm all for simplicity too, that's what I was aiming for in my (rough) lay-out...

One last point is that I'm against changing site name for reasons which have been mostly covered above by other people.
Yeah that's not in the scope of this thread, I've made my point fairly clear there, but there needs to be a more in-depth & well-informed discussion in 6mth+.
We need to know much more about where the industry's really at before careful debate/assessment makes sense.
Last edited by jalyst; 2013-01-26 at 08:01.