Thread
:
[Discussion] Banning and evidence
View Single Post
marmistrz
2013-01-30 , 09:02
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#
1
Hi,
Having seen the storm that has been on tmo (esp. mailing list) about Estel aka Piotr Jawidzyk, I think it's time for the things to change. What really concerns me
1. No evidence stored. - I think that banning Estel was against the law - when I asked for concrete examples of rules being broken by Estel, I received a vague claim: "Look at any of his posts". Later, the council people claimed that Estel is said to have deleted the posts. Nevertheless, the evidence should be stored. Either the post should be frozen, not to be deleted or screenshot. Without evidence being stored you can really ban anyone..
2. Banning because of IP. One maemo.org member has been banned because he had similar IP to Estel's. Similarly, people living in Poland cannot use turbobit as it has oversensitive more-than-one-download-at-a-time checks - even though they don't download anything, they are denied the download
3. There should be a way to appeal about the ban - if one thinks he's not guilty.
These "bugs" may lead to abuses in the future.
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by
PayPal
or
Flattr
Projects no longer actively developed:
here
Last edited by marmistrz; 2013-01-30 at
12:25
.
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to marmistrz For This Useful Post:
Estel
,
ffha
,
Garrett_PL
,
mr_pingu
,
panjgoori
,
petur
,
rfa
marmistrz
View Public Profile
Send a private message to marmistrz
Visit marmistrz's homepage!
Find all posts by marmistrz