View Single Post
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#19
Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
First, let me say that overall, I agree with some of what you're trying to get at. Your use of examples here was quite poor (as will be come clear later in the post). But some of the idea is sound.

There could be changes made to the policy that may make things a little more straight forward. To that end, I offer the following idea to current moderators:

(....)

To stand in defense of what is clearly someone knowingly breaking forum rules, while knowing full well the proper pathways to use, is facetious.
Thanks for clarifying some of the points. Can you please point me the message to the concrete evidence as I can't find it.
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr

Projects no longer actively developed: here
 

The Following User Says Thank You to marmistrz For This Useful Post: