View Single Post
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#32
Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
The first ban happened because of the sheer number of people who hit the "report this" button, the abusive language he used, and for slander and personal attacks against others. This was covered by Chemist in his reply (which I linked in my post above).

For what? Expressing frustration that a core group of people keep repeating the same lies, and claiming that people in charge did something "illegal" or immoral? Even after being shown evidence to the contrary multiple times?

You may not like my "tone" or my style of writing. But at no point above did I devolve to name calling, or lying. In the past few days here, I've had people call me all kinds of names. One even claimed I'd been fired from my past jobs, which is both an attack on my character and a bald-faced lie. Yet I don't see you speaking out against that.
Poor you, sorry I don't follow drama, I treat this as a meritocracy, not popularity contest as some. I'll quote vetsin as he put it very elegantly:

You don't have to use such tone when speaking to someone who's just inquiring. He's not a member of the "fan club" and there is no such thing. There were just a bunch of people who had some interactions with Estel's helpful side and didn't care to watch the drama in the council threads, thus quite clueless on the events.
/quote

I missed (lucky me, though this mud keeps getting pulled out) all the drama, I have yet to see your helpful posts vs Estel's. All I see is wiki-editor level drama, with a lot of huffing and puffing steam around. If Estel got banned by (reworded now) joerg's suggestion, then you should be also. Go back to wiki-wars, you and estel have much in common, that's why I mentioned drinks.

Last edited by szopin; 2013-01-31 at 21:25. Reason: poor writing skills - typo
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post: