View Single Post
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#41
Originally Posted by joerg_rw View Post
I don't know if that post has made anything any more clear.
One thing's for sure though: this refrendum is not meant to change *anything* in the way that things _are_ handled now, and it's not meant for asking your opinion by voting yes or no - we hope this referendum will gain 100% yes votes, since there are no changes planned and with a rejected referendum we're basically f**ked
Great, only at point 4 from above post and few concerns already, but if you can guarantee in the future no power grab scenario can occur without a referendum that's great, because currently it cannot. There are so many one can think of... our community is at last breath, this calls for desparate measures, in order to save it, the few guys that just accepted their nominations agreed to make me supreme councilor, we have no resources to waste in those tiring elections, electorate is already tired, time to act, we need funds now, not on charity basis, this is war, from now on seeing after 50th char of post costs 5$sub, we put it so low so our fellow brown brethren can take part, rest will fund our CES exposure, supreme councilor will be there to speak about our community, this will definitely strengthen opensource/meam.... This can go on and on. I'd prefer to be able to speak my mind lawmaking rather then lawadvisory way about such practices. Referendum is one possibility