View Single Post
joerg_rw's Avatar
Posts: 2,222 | Thanked: 12,651 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ SOL 3
#64
Originally Posted by misterc View Post
let me rephrase then...
who is Woody that we should comply with his opinion.
let me put it again in maybe even stronger words then: who are you to suggest anybody should comply with anybody's opinion here?
Originally Posted by misterc View Post
you will hopefully agree that your post quoted (again) above seems to imply only you, not me, or the community in general, does it, now?
Sorry to disappoint you here, I won't agree on anything like that. It's entirely you who's making up that BS.

[edit]
Originally Posted by misterc View Post
[...]
but admittedly, my post is somewhat sarcastic, so just to make things totally & perfectly clear...
  • i know damn well who Woody is, have been having endless discussion about the sex of angels like arguments long enough on TMO for that, thanks
  • (my point) what makes Woody's opinion the rule and law on TMO?
To put facts totally & perfectly straight: your point is moot since nobody but you suggests that "Woody's opinion [is, or should be] the rule and law on TMO"
Originally Posted by misterc View Post
EDIT: having scrolled back on this thread some, i come to realize that what you mean by
Originally Posted by joerg_rw View Post
according to some wise man (you're free to dig his name up in citations db):
Code:
It is irrelevant how plausible or how backed up by facts an infamation is to make the masses believe it. Really all it needs is constant repetition so they hear it every day for weeks and months.
I know i'm absolutely in line with woody here, and the only logical consequence is to let not a single false statement, lie, or diffamation get by unanswered.
So NO, not answering to trolling that has potential to give others a false idea is not an option.
is simply that you agree with Woody's statement that this referendum won't change anything else as far as referendums are concerned
and, possibly, that rejecting this referendum may doom MO...
And no, my subsentence "I know i'm absolutely in line with woody here" was strictly meant regarding the bonmot about defamations and how to cope with them which I quoted imediately before that very sentence, implying that it's what I (and also woody) think is guiding to the right way to deal with trolling and defamations - answer and oppose them every single time. I honestly can't think how anybody could disassemble my few sentences in such a weird manner and put every subsentence into relation to some random unrelated post of 2 pages back or even in another thread. Is that how you phrase your statements? I try to phrase mine in a sense of continuity, where each sentence is somehow related to the previous one more likely than to random other stuff.
/j
__________________
Maemo Community Council member [2012-10, 2013-05, 2013-11, 2014-06 terms]
Hildon Foundation Council inaugural member.
MCe.V. foundation member

EX Hildon Foundation approved
Maemo Administration Coordinator (stepped down due to bullying 2014-04-05)
aka "techstaff" - the guys who keep your infra running - Devotion to Duty http://xkcd.com/705/

IRC(freenode): DocScrutinizer*
First USB hostmode fanatic, father of H-E-N

Last edited by joerg_rw; 2013-03-30 at 16:56.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to joerg_rw For This Useful Post: