View Single Post
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#35
Yeah, perhaps only send the notice via the same mechanism used to send the ballots (which incidentally I never got).
But I'm talking only in the instance where the balance is quite heavily skewed one way or the other...

Originally Posted by Dave999 View Post
So it's possible to be admin/mod an be in hildon and council at the same time? If so I will withdraw all my votes which is exactly one since it's against what I believe in.
I don't think we should have a "hard & fast" rule that if you're mod or super mod you can't participate, but I do think we should strive to have most such mods hand over their privileges for the term of their office*. Unless said privileges would be genuinely needed by those in office to carry out their duties "effectively". I think there should always be at least one or two top-tier mods who keep their status regardless of whether they're serving or not, just as a insurance mechanism against any new mods who end-up causing mayhem rather than harmony.

*Will that mean they get those privileges back again once done, & those that took their place also keep theirs?
Not sure. I guess having more & more mods over time can't be a BAD thing, can it?

Last edited by jalyst; 2013-04-23 at 07:26.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: