View Single Post
Estel's Avatar
Posts: 5,028 | Thanked: 8,613 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#981
Originally Posted by Copernicus View Post
Anyway, the bottom line is that after a lot of mucking around in the code, I've limited the performance damage to the point at which you choose a favorite on the left-hand menu. Sometimes you can switch between favorites as fast as normal; sometimes, though, it can pause for a significant amount of time, which I believe is QSettings trying to sync with the flash storage. I'll keep working on it, but I'm not sure whether I can improve it significantly; in the end it may be quicker to just remove this feature and go back to navigating to the panel collection you want...
Personally, I always prefer programs to respond quickly and reliably vs. fancy things like remembering this or that. Especially, the part about "syncing with flash" creeps me - big "no" for additional flash wear, where it isn't required (why Qt must be so lame in breaking so simple things?!).

Of course, I appreciate effort put into bringing those features, I just think that it is bad idea to sacrifice performance/reliability for it. It may also be a development trap - now you minimize damage to acceptable level, in a week you will add something to program, and chain reaction will make performance bad again, requiring minimizing damage again...

/Estel
__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: