Same here, many times, responses have been vague at best....

That's the thing, they invite us to participate, as though our engagement's very important, yet so far there's been little sign that they're engaged in the whole process at all.
N.B. I'm not referring to this (very recent) initiative of yours, I hope things evolve differently...

Agreed, just a short while ago, there was resistance from admins to do what they have in fact recently done.
But I wasn't questioning the basic structure, just the title of the actual sub-forum, it's a bit odd...

If there's zero engagement, then we'll never know if they're actively monitoring, OR doing some internal brainstorming only, & just "paying lip service" to the community input thing.
But to assume the latter & hence do nothing is probably worse, so it's best that we at least do something, infuriating as it may sometimes be.
The only reason I ask if we're eventually going to condense & formally present the info, is because that's what they've typically asked for previously.
That's typically been their requirement before they will consider absorbing the info. & (possibly) engaging to some degree.