I completely agree with the argument you made in your post, but this comment threw me a little...

1) I don't believe he used it to prove a point... merely to support Nokia's decision to include the overtly 'green' message.

2) A bit off-topic, but since when is a wikipedia article NOT a relavent source of information? Regardless of your personal opinion, as long as the article is old enough to have been reviewed and includes references, it's as valid as any other source on the internet (and it's awfully hard to provide a hyperlink to anything that's not).