View Single Post
Estel's Avatar
Posts: 5,028 | Thanked: 8,613 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#13
Originally Posted by marmistrz View Post
2. And what if both swaps are enabled (swapset startup)
Then user is wasting space for 2nd swap, without any additional (real) benefits. Additionally, said user doubles loss, due to getting rid of ability to have one physical storage device *without* swap writes to it

Originally Posted by marmistrz View Post
3. Why not? Won't it improve the overall performance while recording?
Performance of whole device (as usual, with higher CPU speed) - but, it's purely theoretical gain, as you're hardly doing other things while recording. That said, I always use 500-900 limits, so I may be missing some "lagging fun" at lower frequencies.

Originally Posted by marmistrz View Post
Isn't the "stuttering" of the video caused by the unability to save everything on time?
Yes, but it is related to either slowdowns of writing to storage medium, or what FMG said - in either case, it's not about CPU speed (which, even at 500 mhz, is able to generate writes for much higher speeds, than our flash storage media will ever allow).
---

Theoretically, one could gain better speeds of writing by using real "spinning disks" HDD connected via USB mass storage mode. Hoever, hostmode seems to have max ~4 MB/s write speed (due to some imperfections in hostmode implementation), which makes WiFi our fastest connection with the world (if we skip N900 as USB client + USB networking scenario, which is even faster).

/Estel
__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1 | ereswap | bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!

Last edited by Estel; 2013-07-13 at 12:51.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: