View Single Post
Posts: 1,298 | Thanked: 2,277 times | Joined on May 2011
#647
Originally Posted by Morpog View Post
WOW, your summary is quite negative, given what I have read on IRC, while following your conversation with Stskeeps.

http://pastebin.com/bhxnjm1q
Not negative, but concerned. In short Stskeeps said that now things are closed, and future is unknown, but it's not easy to make things open. If you want, make a formal inquiry to Jolla about opening things. Did I sum it up right?

You can assume a few things (but again, these are just assumptions):
1. At the release core applications and UI will remain closed.
2. Jolla is undecided yet about future.

Why I find it concerning:
1. No sharing of effort with Nemo about UI and applications. Ideally I'd even prefer Nemo and Sailfish to merge into one. Or Nemo to become what Fedora is for RHEL (note all of them are open). With Sailfish being closed - it's impossible.
2. Harmattan pitfalls risk.
3. Disadvantage in comparison to fully open systems (Firefox OS).

I'm not trying to be negative, I'm trying to analyze the issue objectively.

Last edited by shmerl; 2013-07-17 at 18:04.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to shmerl For This Useful Post: