View Single Post
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#823
Originally Posted by shmerl View Post
From here: https://sailfishos.org/about-license.html
So hopefully they won't lose the momentum and won't retain their applications and UI closed source.
In this talk....
http://kde-app.mirror.uber.com.au/ak...ilfish_OS.webm
Or maybe it was this one...
http://files.kde.org/akademy/2013/vi...er_and_Qt.webm
The Jolla employee seemed very sure that it'll eventually become mostly open (if not 100%).
Orig. source:
http://files.kde.org/akademy/2013/videos/

Originally Posted by shmerl View Post
I doubt "licensing Sailfish" is a good model at all. They need something else. Partnerships, etc.
Mozilla for example doesn't "license" Firefox OS - it's fully open source. Still, they have partners. How exactly does it work?
Much of this area is covered [fairly] well in the MeR video I linked above.

Last edited by jalyst; 2013-08-03 at 04:53.