The same option they would have had if Nokia had made PR1.4.

You know where is this from, right?

The Community Seamless Software Update (CSSU) is being developed by the Maemo community as a continuation of, and expansion on, Nokia's update support.


I am not saying we should behave the same way Nokia did, but there are times one have to make choices. And if I have to choose between no more CSSU updates (because, lets be honest, we lack the manpower to change the -mp thing and transform it according to some better FOSS standard) and to make CSSU unavailable to a couple of people using some the-best-kernel-ever-made (while fixing the long-standing nasty bug in omap1) or don't like the exact color of a button in the resolution change dialog in nikocam, I'll choose the latter in an instant.

Wrong, CSSU will not depend on a particular kernel, but on a kernel feature, patches are FOSS, so anyone can port them to the fancy kernel he uses and stay compatible with CSSU