Thread: Ultimate Hacking device.
View Single Post
Artyom's Avatar
Artyom is offline Artyom
2013-08-12 , 20:57
Posts: 289 | Thanked: 185 times | Joined on Sep 2012 @ Worldwide
#59
Good your being yourself again. Not the impersonal troll.
Originally Posted by PurpleXS8 View Post
Dear troll, I think you misread my username and TheoX =/= PurpleXS8.
Oh really? That signature and these tell me the exact opposite. And unlike you i don't spam useless and meaningless posts and threads. Just on the off topic ones maybe.

Originally Posted by PurpleXS8 View Post
Second of your argument is invalid: If you go on the street and ask random persons about both devices the chance of anybody giving an answer else then "I don't know both" is 10%. When your N900 was launched, the HTC Universal was doing so well, people were very happy to have a mini-laptop in their pockets running Linux. 99% of the devices running windows mobile could run Android.
Nope it's not. You just can't handle the truth. Even the endest user can tell some stuff about the n900 and not the "epic" htc universal. yet you ignore this and live in a bubble. When the n900 was launched that device wasn't even on the map. Obviously your only criterion of a "hacking device" is Installing lot's of os's. Hilarious.

Originally Posted by PurpleXS8 View Post
Now to give you 2 mind blowing devices I've been researching about except this HTC Universal:

HTC HD2 is the true hackers device. HTC HD2 was the only device so extensively hacked and opened that rignt now it could run the Windows 8 RT, Android, Ubuntu, Windows Phone, Windows Mobile and whatever else you can think of. The bootloader of this device had enough security breaches so that hackers can home-build their own custom bootloader intended for any possible OS.
Again istalling different software does not make that device the ultimate hacking device that's just your criterion.

Originally Posted by PurpleXS8 View Post
Now the most opened device, even more open then N900 was made by HTC in 2008. It's called the HTC Shift, and it was the 1st smartphone natively running dual-boot. It came with Windows Mobile as the 1st OS and Windows Vista as the second OS, Intel x86 based CPU and 1GB of RAM. Due to the technology back then, the BIOS (not bootloader this time) could not be locked, so this phone can easily run ANYTHING you want WITHOUT ANY LIMITATIONS.
THAT'S AN X86 BASED PC N900 IS AN ARM BASED SMARTPHONE. You claim that htc universal is the ultimate hacking device why put different and different devices to the game? did the n900 came too much for you?
If you intend to use that chock as a phone, good luck with that. it's clear that you can't understand the difference between a smartphone and a portable pc.

Originally Posted by PurpleXS8 View Post
When replying please do a little more research in advance, or else you will just make a full of yourself. Second, anything that you point as fact and it's not based on real, solid arguments and facts is religion like and when I last read this section's description, religion was prohibited here. Before I wrote this thread, I owned a HTC Universal, I know what it's capable of and the true comparative between these 2 handhelds is: Nokia N900 >= HTC Universal.
Please, you do some research. I'm not the one who is claiming that pc's are the ultimate hacking phones. Rock solid statements right? And weren't you saying there is no difference between the multitasking of android and maemo/meego? LOL. After that I knew that you were not a person to be paid attention to.
such a shame that you research so much but yet you don't know anything.

and you should be the one apologizing for subverting the community. because of people like you, this community is splitting day by day.
Last edited by Artyom; 2013-08-12 at 21:13.