Thread: Ubuntu Edge
View Single Post
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#322
Originally Posted by Bernard View Post
Both phone platforms are based on Linux and QML/Qt, but other than that there are very different propositions, so I don't know if Edge backers are also interested in the Jolla device.
Canonical focuses on:
  • generic OS for desktop, phone and tablet
  • phone can be used as desktop computer
  • high-end hardware

Jolla:
  • phone OS only
  • best phone experience possible (UI focused on phone-screen-size, android application compatibility etc.)
  • individualized hardware (switchable covers, different colors etc.)

If I would classify, than the Edge is more similar to the N900 and the Jolla phone more like the N9 in design philosophy.
Sailfish with Mer could very well work on Tablet market too.

What Jolla had said is that right now sailfishos UI is fokus on phone, or more exact Jollas first phone. Now compare that with Canonical who says "hey we have something that will work everywhere" but actually Canonical has only showed a solid working desktop platform (ubuntu that is). And then some alpha touchOS that is far from ready compared to what the jolla engineers has shown so far.

I still do NOT beleive Canonical can show a fully working touchOS with stable HW in May next year. What they will show is a halfbacked hw prototype with cool design.


Mark is just good marketing guy. Jolla has the better embedded engineers ut not as good marketing team...
__________________
Keep safe and healthy

Last edited by mikecomputing; 2013-08-18 at 20:25.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mikecomputing For This Useful Post: