View Single Post
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#1867
Originally Posted by switch-hitter View Post
There's very little doubt NOKIA would have phased out Symbian and replaced it with some Linux based alternative(s) but once Qt was running right across all NOKIA's devices who would've noticed and who would've cared?

Carriers would have continued marketing NOKIA phones, users would have carried on buying them and developers would have carried on developing for them. There would have been no 'burning platforms', no huge disruption, no induced collapse, no dumbing-down/locking-down of devices and no association with a toxic third party. On top of that NOKIA would have retained control of their own ecosystem and all revenue from it.
I think you are delusional that Qt across multiple different OSs would have made these devices competitive. Its the same delusion that Android apps will run seamlessly on Jolla. NO WAY. Even Symbian fragmentation posed great problems for developers. Again, you are a fanboy for unclear reason. Not sure where it hurts and why. I hope someone writes a good history of what truly happened inside the four walls of NOKIA and why the decisions were made they were. I bet we know little of the story.