Thread
:
[Announce] kernel-power stable v52 in Extras
View Single Post
pkz
2013-09-06 , 23:26
Posts: 28 | Thanked: 34 times | Joined on Jul 2012 @ Meran, Italy
#
147
@sowwhatyoureap: AFAIK, from my point of view yes, there is a dependency problem, the same I mentioned before.
One question: are You trying to run the power kernel from U-boot or are You going to install it as a unique kernel in Your system?
If the answer was yes, i.e. You are going to launch the kernel power throughout U-boot, then two questions would rise into my mind for pali:
@pali: if one wants to use the kernel power throughout U-boot, is it necessary to install kernel-power-flasher? I am asking that because I (probably erroneously) think that kernel-power-flasher will ask to flash the kernel power into the nand, to substitute the Nokia stock kernel.
And in general, question number two, which is the minimum set of packages needed for this kind of configuration? I'm gonna try to guess, and please, let me know where I am wrong:
* kernel: yes because it is needed by U-boot?
* kernel-bootimg: no because U-boot is launched into this kernel "session"
* kernel-flasher: yes but it is substituted by u-boot-flasher, and it can be removed if U-boot has to remain installed
* kernel-modules: yes
* u-boot-flasher: ??? needed for installing U-boot; would it be possible to remove i after flash?
* u-boot-for-power-kernel: not necessary, obsolete package?
* u-boot-tools: yes
* uboot-mkimage: not necessary, obsolete package?
* uboot-power: not necessary, obsolete package?
* uboot-pr13: not necessary, obsolete package?
* kernel-power: not needed?
* kernel-power-bootimg: yes, needed by U-boot to launch the kernel power
* kernel-power-flasher: no if one use U-boot?
* kernel-power-modules: yes
Thanks in advance.
pkz
Quote & Reply
|
The Following User Says Thank You to pkz For This Useful Post:
handaxe
pkz
View Public Profile
Send a private message to pkz
Find all posts by pkz