View Single Post
Copernicus's Avatar
Posts: 1,986 | Thanked: 7,698 times | Joined on Dec 2010 @ Dayton, Ohio
#385
Originally Posted by joerg_rw View Post
All problems got considered and found moot. Don't worry it will work :-) Even while it violates IrDA specs (which is a reason we don't usually see it being done, along with power consumption reasons) IrDA transceivers always come with LED and photodiode in a module, nobody usually puts a second IR LED in just for fun, after all it's IrDA and not meant for CIR.
Oh, well, if we're talking installing two LEDs here (one for IrDA and another for CIR), then that would get around the issue easily. Just use the appropriate LED for either task. It still might not be so usable as a learning remote, but everything else should work. (As I've probably mentioned before, I'm not a hardware guy, I don't know these things...)

Originally Posted by pichlo View Post
I might be wrong but I thing Copernicus meant over-saturating our own receiver. We might need to reduce the output power in full duplex mode. Actually, maybe even in half duplex mode since saturated semiconductors tend to take some time to get out of the saturation.
I don't think full duplex is ever used... From the IrDA Wiki page,

IrDA data communications operate in half-duplex mode because while transmitting, a device’s receiver is blinded by the light of its own transmitter, and thus, full-duplex communication is not feasible. The two devices that communicate simulate full duplex communication by quickly turning the link around. The primary device controls the timing of the link, but both sides are bound to certain hard constraints and are encouraged to turn the link around as fast as possible.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Copernicus For This Useful Post: