View Single Post
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#707
Originally Posted by joerg_rw View Post
They obviously are not and never will be interested in this project, neither in the customers that are interested in this project.
Jolla targets mass market and tries to compete with other smartphones (like already N9 did), while this project is about continuation of the NIT (Nokia Internet Tablet) concept,
Not to troll or take the thread off-topic, but in all fairness that's a really big call to make about hw/sw you've never used...
Everything they've hinted is that it'll be far less crippled than Harmattan WRT it's many closed components & crazy security frameworks.
Even the UX looks very different to Harmattan's, & with large chunks of it purported to be open, it may be more Harmattan-like or more Nemo/Freemantle-like, take your pick.
The only way you could say it's not in the spirit of the N900, is via the fact that it doesn't have a physical qwerty, at least "out-of-the-box".
This project borrows the N900 concept & takes it to a level of openness far greater than the original N900/Fremantle, possibly the Jolla_Ph/Sailfish too, that's what I/others like.

Last edited by jalyst; 2013-10-04 at 12:45.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: