I made the response where I did as I wanted readers of my previous post to easily be able to see my follow up. I'll not pursue trifles though.

I made neither claims or assertions. It would be obvious to anyone with a grasp of the English language that all I provided was purely perspective. My reference to the statement a member of Jolla made is absolutely true.

Your tone is likened to the typical egos that frequent message boards. I don't know if this is your usual attitude or if your caustic reply was due to excessive enthusiasm for Jolla. If you are passionate about Jolla, please try to express it in a more peaceful manner. Adults should be able to disagree without tension. Yours is exactly the kind of retort that yields ridiculous page long quarrels.

Friends?

Abe