View Single Post
dos1's Avatar
Posts: 257 | Thanked: 2,053 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ Warsaw, Poland
#1017
Originally Posted by kingoddball View Post
Then it seems like the "Optimal" specs should be removed. It is giving a false hope to people who do not read the entire report.

Many people will find the spec page - See all 4 lines, notice the optimal and donate in hope for the Dual/Quad, when in reality this is already set to an OMAP3.

Just seems like something which should be omitted.
"The following table compares what we have in the GTA04 (Letux2804) and the RX51. And it shows what we can achieve by doing a minimal adaptation of the circuitry to the RX51 case and external components. And what some people would like to see."

For me it's pretty clear. And there are realistic specs listed on both http://neo900.org/specs and the donation page - and in the feasibility study itself. To be honest I don't know how one can donate and fail to notice that.
__________________
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak - https://dosowisko.net/
Long term Openmoko supporter. Owner of two Neo Freerunners, a few N900s and some others too.
Future owner of the Neo900
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to dos1 For This Useful Post: