View Single Post
Posts: 2,225 | Thanked: 3,822 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ Florida
#41
Originally Posted by Mentalist Traceur View Post
Quick note, segfaulting at boot on my main, still 'r&d-virgin' N900, not sure what's up. I quite possibly just f'ed something up copying it over from my development N900, but this might indicate a deeper issue and that my code is not as ready as I had hoped.
Okay, this is weird. It is definitely the same exact binary, segfaulting on the r&d-virgin N900 at bootup, but not on the development one where it no longer does.

So there is still more work do be done, I am missing something somewhere. But for now, I am out. Sleep. Needs to happen. Besides that, I updated the source once again in case the above post didn't make that obvious. I cleaned up the code that handles the R&D-virgin N900s correctly (there was a cal_finish() call left in one of those code paths from years ago, and I fixed the messages it provided to be more meaningful thanks to me getting new understanding of what they mean myself, and made it actually properly distinguish between the 'R&D virgin' error and the other errors that might be returned - I also made it use the cal.h defined macros for the return values of cal_read_block instead of just going by the numerical value as the old code did..

Edit: P.S. reinob, etc, anyone still left with an N900 that hasn't been R&D mode turned-on, ever?
__________________
If you want to donate in support of anything that I do, you can do so with either of these options:
PayPal | Bitcoin: 1J4XG2z97iFEKNZXThHdFHq6AeyWEHs8BJ | [Will add other donation options eventually]
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Mentalist Traceur For This Useful Post: