View Single Post
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#116
Originally Posted by shmerl View Post
I'm not sure what does the above have to do with the openness of code and development? We weren't talking about open drivers yet. Vivaldi isn't using open drivers either. They are using the same closed Android blobs and libhybris. We were mostly talking about open code of the OS (above hardware adaptation) and open development. Open hardware adaptation is a separate topic.
Seems I have to be more clear:

Can you tell me how real companys can make money of fully opensource software? In Jollas case qwhy on earth would any compay "license SailfishOS" if it in the same time was fully opensource? I also had asked that question lately about digia's Qt? Not many is my guess.. Probadly thats why Boot2Qt is not open.

Because that is what it is about in the end. You need money to pay your bills.

That is big difference from hobbyprojects like Vivaldi. I am sure those who contibute to Vivaldi has some income somewhere else.

But that seems people not to understand here. Probadly because mom and dad pay your bills...
__________________
Keep safe and healthy

Last edited by mikecomputing; 2013-12-06 at 18:11.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mikecomputing For This Useful Post: