View Single Post
Posts: 3,401 | Thanked: 1,255 times | Joined on Nov 2005 @ London, UK
#1852
Originally Posted by wout.martens View Post
This, i dont agree.
While the N9 was / is a very nice phone I have to say the overall performance of the Jolla Phone is much better !

Jolla OS lacks a lot and the UI is beta and needs many improvements but going back to the N9 is a step down in overall performance.
Performance is totally different to functionality. I don't mind waiting a few extra seconds to get something done on an N9[50], but there's no point having better performance when the Jolla simply can't do what the N9[50] can do, or does it in a worse way.

I'd genuinely be putting my SIM back in my N950 right now if only I hadn't chopped it up to fit into the Jolla, as I fear putting it back into the N950 with a SIM adapter is only going to bugger up the N950 SIM slot.

I support what Jolla are trying to achieve, I've always supported the Nokia internet tablets since 2005, but it's hard to express how disappointed I am with what Jolla have delivered after all this time - it really is sub-N9 functionality. Yes it's early days, but apart from being directed to a developers mailing list Jolla are engaging far less with their users than even Nokia did with Harmattan (no public Bugzilla, for a start, even though the Noia one was largely pointless).

Last edited by Milhouse; 2013-12-17 at 15:46.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Milhouse For This Useful Post: