View Single Post
Posts: 98 | Thanked: 104 times | Joined on Dec 2013
#1285
Originally Posted by att View Post
Yes, and Jolla's people are not seers. If they had known in time, they could have averted or lessened the problems.

I'm pretty sure that they would have told this if they had known and figured it out at that time.
But they did see there was a delay beforehand, they just hoped it would go away. Cybette told us as much, that they didn't want to alarm people. I think they should have alarmed, openness is always the best when it is timely. Had they communicated then and there, when the issues started looming, or communicated like their CEO now does that DNA channel may just be faster for them, people would have had more information to make educated choices or at least more educated guesses.

That's the great part of openness. You don't have to know everything for the recipient, you involve the recipient in the process and let them make decisions with that information. In return, the recipient feels more involved in the process.

What is important to understand here that Jolla's audience at this point isn't the generic public. We are talking about quite knowledgeable people for most part. Giving them info is not the same situation as giving same to the average Joe.

A sense of community, you know.