Thread: Ces 2015
View Single Post
HtheB's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 3,718 | Thanked: 7,420 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Bize Her Yer Trabzon
#32
Originally Posted by aegis View Post
I preferred the first plastic model personally. At least that looked unusual and the price was better.

The steel model looks cheaper, like a cheap fashion knockoff brand watch, but isn't.

I still don't see the point though until you can get months out of the battery. These smar****ch designers seem to forget what is useful about non-smar****ches.

The Sony smar****ch I had for about 2 months was annoying, requiring recharging every 3-5 days and it looked a heck of a lot better than the pebble. The main problem though was it never managed to keep a connection with my phone and didn't work as a watch unless connected to get the time from the phone. And then Sony stopped updating their app for that model smar****ch and the old software didn't work on Android 4.x.

edit: sigh. the forum software doesn't like T W A T.
I actually bought the Pebble Steel because it looks a lot more stylish.
Battery last way longer on the Pebble then on the Sony smart watches... Note that the screen on Pebble is always on, while all the other smart watches out there you need to something before you see the time, like pressing a button.

There is also an appstore announced for the Pebble watch. I think that guys like Pebble will support their watches better then other companies
__________________
www.HtheB.com
Please donate if you think I'm doing a good job.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to HtheB For This Useful Post: