Thread: Ces 2015
View Single Post
tissot's Avatar
Posts: 1,839 | Thanked: 2,432 times | Joined on May 2009
#33
Originally Posted by aegis View Post
I preferred the first plastic model personally. At least that looked unusual and the price was better.

The steel model looks cheaper, like a cheap fashion knockoff brand watch, but isn't.

I still don't see the point though until you can get months out of the battery. These smar****ch designers seem to forget what is useful about non-smar****ches.
I'm really surprised how the metal pebble is getting praised. That wrist band looks like something from a 80's Casio.
That housing though I think is the best yet of any smart watch.


This Pebble is certainly not enough for me to buy it, but it just shows how utterly crazy, crappy Samsung Gear is. 10 hour battery life and design only fit for Asian teenager. Not to talk about how you should charge Gear. That thing has made no sense to me ever since it was announced.

EDIT:
Originally Posted by HtheB View Post
I actually bought the Pebble Steel because it looks a lot more stylish.
Battery last way longer on the Pebble then on the Sony smart watches... Note that the screen on Pebble is always on, while all the other smart watches out there you need to something before you see the time, like pressing a button.

There is also an appstore announced for the Pebble watch. I think that guys like Pebble will support their watches better then other companies
I guess there's no point on arguing about looks.
I do agree that Pebble is getting the concept of a what smart watch should be. Again repeating myself on how lost Samsung or Sony are with their smart watch concept. I guess especially Samsung will need Apple or possibly Pebble to show the way before they put their hardware superiority to play.

Last edited by tissot; 2014-01-07 at 15:22.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to tissot For This Useful Post: