View Single Post
javispedro's Avatar
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#41
Originally Posted by malkavian View Post
Sure? They even talk about location of their servers around the world. Or maybe you are talking about the control of the servers (wich are closed source and cannot be implemented (except by reverse engineering)).
Obviously. Why do I care if they have servers in the US east coast AND the US west coast? They're controlled by the same person/entity. That's my definition of centralized.

Originally Posted by malkavian View Post
And the world could end, but it is not predicted yet. Free sowftware community could then fork last GPLv2 version and do reverse engineering for the servers.
Unlike the world ending, cloud providers disappearing has happened way too many times to count. And when that happens, so do all your contacts.

And why would free software community fork _their_ software, when there are existing and working clients and protocols that are just better? And the existing ones even have open server implementations!

Originally Posted by malkavian View Post
Having an open protocol wich can be implemented wherever you like and with promises of good privacy protection is great and much better than actual situation. Telegram is getting very popular, and while defeating Whatsapp is difficult, maybe is doable. Most of people don't worry about privacy or openess but about not having to pay 1$/year. It's stupid, they pay much more for the mobile service, but I don't care while I get an open, widely used and privacy respectful IM.
Well, Telegram is not open, not widely used (yet), and hardly privacy respectful. In which way does the situation improve????? I just don't see it.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to javispedro For This Useful Post: