Thread: N810 & N95 Memory Cards – 6Q's
View Single Post
dalinian's Avatar
dalinian is offline dalinian
2008-02-12 , 15:25
Posts: 7 | Thanked: 2 times | Joined on Jan 2008 @ London
#4
Thanks for the info, linux_author and pixelseventy2. I'll aggregate incoming answers to those 6 questions (from this and two other forum postings) in the OP above, soonish, when I have the time, and assuming I can do it on my NIT, since I'm off to the coast tomorrow, and I'm gonna try NOT lugging a 17" PowerBook around for the first time in years!

Originally Posted by linux_author View Post
- actually, the limits you're asking about can generally be found by examining manufacturer information, industry information relating to standards, and current limitations for manufacturing fabs..
So, linux_author, encouraging me to FURTHER online research, huh? Why I oughta... Good thing I'm 'time rich/cash poor/wealth comfortable' kinda guy, else such encouragement could sound like a provocation! I'll see what I can find out, raise my geek-quotient still higher, and consolidate results in this thread.

Originally Posted by pixelseventy2 View Post
AFAIK, and I have confirmed this from testing and using them, mini-sd to sd adapters and there kin are just pin-converters, mapping from small to large. As SD and SDHC are pin-compatible, there are no reasons why there should need to be different adapters.
Ta, pixelseventy2 – I think that about nails it for Q2, and we can provisionally declare that, "All miniSD-sized adapters are generic pin-converters, mapping from small to large, ie: they all serve up the full memory capacity of the microSD/microSDHC card inserted into them to the SDHC-compliant N810 into which they are slotted." If on testing my milage varies, I'll post here; otherwise that'll be upgraded to a canonical declaration.
Last edited by dalinian; 2008-02-12 at 15:30. Reason: formatting improvements