View Single Post
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#109
Originally Posted by frafI View Post
No, this could cause strange behavior, if we really get a new libx11. But =2:1.1.99.6+0m5 | 2:1.1.99.6+0m5-thumb1 should be possible. But IMHO the cleaner option is to change libx11-thumb to require the standard libx11-data instead of its own identical copy. See e.g. https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/libx11-data . If you want the thumb-CSSU to be complete on its own simply include a libx11-data without the -thumb suffix.
Or maybe

libx11-data (>=2:1.1.99.6+0m5), libx11-data (<< 2:1.1.100)

Not to allow too big libx11-data?
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr

Projects no longer actively developed: here
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to marmistrz For This Useful Post: