View Single Post
mikelima's Avatar
Posts: 141 | Thanked: 359 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ Italy
#230
Originally Posted by shallimus View Post

Let them focus on that first. Openness is important, but for now our best hope is that Jolla provides support for the community to implement all these wonderful things. That's the best of both worlds: real people will actually want to use Sailfish, and the ultra-geeks can also use Sailfish on whatever hardware to do whatever grey-hat hacking things you want to do.

If Jolla can't appeal to the consumer, then they will sink without a trace and we'll be back to... what, exactly?

Exactly.
I don't entirely agree. At this stage Jolla is only interesting to tinkerers, hobbyst-developers and Finns, still morning for Nokia demise.

Of course, in the longer term, Jolla wants to attract regular users, but the "ecosystem" is too small at the moment, or, put it another way, many applications that regular users want are out of reach. So, listening to developers/tinkerers (their current customers) is important. Also, developers are people too, and they too need many things regular people need to make use of their phone. So in the end it is all a question of balance.

Also, consumer-level features cost money (Maps, social networks require licensing/partnership), while improving the lower levels requires the time of already hired engineers...

And with the right infrastructure in place, "consumer" level feature may be developed by third parties and tinkerers.

So given there is a finite amount of money and time available to Jolla, they will have to invest them wisely... And I think infrastructure will need to be a big part of the improvements to do from now on.
__________________
My projects: Quando Parte, Quanto Fa
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mikelima For This Useful Post: