It's sad Carsten that you want to simplify it all to personal conflict. The problem is about company cutting off their loyal and long contributor from some parts of contribution. Regarding the meeting I've made a long response about why the meeting rules in my opinion weren't fair at all, moreover I have given response to all important accusations that were made on that meeting, including yours in a mail.

First off all Carsten in contrast to you, most of the time I express my opinions and show evidence openly. You tell people to contact you privately so you can easily tell lies about me and I don't have chance to defend to those accusations or assumptions you present as facts. Do you think such behavior is fair? For those who read Carsten's post on sailfish-devel mailing list I recommend reading my FAQ. Also it's worth to ask questions if Carsten has any professional knowledge (appropriate studies) and experience (for example in work as a psychologist) to give arbitral verdicts what someones state is or not, if it is improving or not.

I'm seriously thinking about your motivation Carsten and why are you still denying the facts? Do you think it's really in Thomas interest? Don't you think that tolerating pathology by you and the company is correct and good for him?