View Single Post
Posts: 80 | Thanked: 59 times | Joined on Aug 2012
#47
Originally Posted by Philippe View Post
Well that is one not very common, and unfortunate event, and that was done for a very good reason.
I would to ask what _alleged_ wife harassing has to do with banning someone from IRC channels like #jollamobile. How it is realted with Jolla topic? What are those good reasons you are speaking about are? Tell us.

There was no wife harassing and mr. Munk now tries to explain through his lawyer that word "harass" has different meaning in British and American English. Also he claims that #jollamobile is his private channel (what then it does on official sailfishos.org website?). That's his line of defense now... Unfortunately it seems it will end at court if the other side is not willing to look for amicable solution to prevent court case.

But going back to Jolla. How does it goes along with such values as respect? Mr Munk did exactly what Mr Perl did earlier, got rid/excluded someone because of purely personal reasons and using exaggeration. "Wife harassing" libel was just a handy tool to discredit and get rid of someone.

How does Mr Munk coworkers behave:
https://twitter.com/J00lllaaaPL/stat...49796619206656

There is some sad story/secret behind it? Really? Saying that and not saying what it is or who is the source of such revelation is nothing more than a pure insinuation. Is that how Jolla means being respectful? Ok, they can always say that Harri was speaking private there. I think for Jolla it is very handy way to say when their employees are speaking privately or as a company, depending what is better in certain case (like Mr Munk's claims through his lawyer that #jollamobile is his private channel to justify his actions on that channel).
Jolla behaviour is really comparable to situation where Minister of Enviroment (put here Munk/Perl) after hours, during weekend throws trash in the forest and when caught, then prime minister (put here Jolla) explains that his minister was doing that as a private person not as a minister. Do you see the hypocrisy in such statements?

Originally Posted by Philippe View Post
You can even see the people in the log you pointed at agree with the action.
That's a very poor justification. If the people from the log will decide to stone someone it will be ok? Do you agree with that? Who of those guys from logs really took effort to get a professional translator to check what was written by me on Twitter? No, Google Translate has poor quality of translating to Polish, due to complicated grammar rules and different forms, that sometimes change the whole meaning. Most of people simply believed in what Munk was saying, because how such technical genius could be wrong.

Also if you look here Philippe, there are different opinions than yours about whole case by people from .... Scandinavia (Janne, Random Random):

http://mynokiablog.com/2014/08/21/jo...#disqus_thread

To me Jolla is not an open company. If their strategy is to show everyone that they are perfect and they rock, then I don't think they will have a bright future and success. Compare Jolla and how Neo900 project openly comunicates about problems.

Last edited by fk_lx; 2014-08-27 at 08:31.