Thread: Discussing JollaOy strategy
View Single Post
nodevel is offline nodevel
2014-08-27 , 16:36
Posts: 752 | Thanked: 2,808 times | Joined on Jan 2011 @ Czech Republic
#104
Originally Posted by pango View Post
Of course. But that, too, is a complete non-answer from a transparency point of view.
It is a complete answer. Your idea of transparency is clearly different from mine... You want transparency just for the sake of transparency? Would you want Jolla to publish the exact time every employee comes to work and the time (s)he leaves? Because if they withhold such information, there are not 100% transparent, are they?

Please explain to me what benefit (to anyone) it would bring if Jolla talked publicly about the SIM issue (which is probably a problem of an initial batch so it doesn't apply to today anyways). Jolla would be completely stupid if they published it.
They have most likely fixed it in other revisions, but Jolla would forever be "the phone with the SIM card issue" which clearly isn't the case.

Perhaps. But they are not unlike. They don't boast about transparency, do they?
Jolla is already more transparent than any of them (look through the mailing list, Mer sources, TJC, IRC meetings) - I would say it is too transparent, I would hold back a bit if I were them.

But shouldn't those values mean something? A smaller company has more direct human ability to live them, due to less organizational abstraction?
A larger company has much more personnel to deal with customers.


PS: I still think that I am talking to fk_lx, because some arguments hold similar (non)logic. I've been a witness of quite a few fk_lx/JollaPL conversation switcharoos, so it wouldn't be completely off.
Last edited by nodevel; 2014-08-27 at 16:48.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nodevel For This Useful Post: