You are repeating yourself, and again you are claiming that there is something besides election rules . So if this is about the election rules why are you starting a flamewar for it? Why call people names and why even bother? We could have left council out of the whole eV idea, but that was nothing we wanted to do. So here we are, you complaining about a future where active community members have more power than idle community members.

We can have a look in the future how to get council election rules properly outside of eV, be aware that this could mean that council looses its current abilities in regard to eV (we tried to, maybe you have an idea that is keeping it liable, note that active participation in the eV needs the general meeting in control).

So what can you come up with instead of blaming and flaming people, right now? It is understood that you do not like it this way, but there is nothing you can do about eV coming your way apart of blocking everything - this will end at some point as neither you nor council owns this place.

So stop getting personal, win7 is trying to explain it and clear off questions that arise from your very loud complaints. It would help if you stop calling people liars, too.

Sidenote: having the council elected by a user-base outside the eV did also need to define that user-base within the eV (must be under general meeting control,again), there are laws we need to apply to and that was as close as we could get (by asking a lawyer on input on exactly these issues). If you have any idea on how to change it within applicable law - share it with us!