View Single Post
Posts: 702 | Thanked: 2,059 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ UK
#97
Originally Posted by Jedibeeftrix View Post
slower cpu - there i was thinking it was a quad-core vs dual
It is but the Jolla is dual Krait cores at 1.4ghz whereas the Moto is quad Cortex A7 at 1.2Ghz. Dual Kraits usually beat Quad A7 in most situations.

Originally Posted by Jedibeeftrix View Post
less ram - there i was thinking they both had a GB
Sorry, meant the storage RAM not main RAM. Moto is only 8GB.

Originally Posted by Jedibeeftrix View Post
bigger screen with higher resolution and higher quality - what a turn off!
I meant compared to the first generation which had the same resolution but a smaller screen. 5" is too big IMHO.

Originally Posted by Jedibeeftrix View Post
camera - pretty sure the camera is better too now.
8MP, Same as a Jolla, up from 5mp in the previous generation. It could be a VGA camera as far as I'm concerned. All phone cameras are ****.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aegis For This Useful Post: