And as part of this productive talk, you quickly ignored the one-and-a-half A4 page post reply that I gave you, explaining why your idea of how organization should work is:

a) completely absurd in the context of law (any law, to be honest, not only german one - as woodie rightly stated)

b) based on wrong assumptions (inherited from joerg, apparently) about Council having any role governing Board, at any time in the past.

Sure, you might have not find my wording pleasant, but running from talk base don *arguments* - by replying only to post by chemist (unrelated to any of your ideas) isn't a mature way for having a "productive talk".

Personal sympathies doesn't have a s**t to do with it - I may not like your view/behavior on many things lately, but still I have spent n amount of time to write long reply to your post, as I *thought* that you're really trying to contribute productively to that discussion. In such case, it deserved answer, not being sunk in the surrounding constant spoiled-kiddo-joerg related bickering. Instead, you're pushing it into your personal arguments with chemist - like it would be more important than the serious matters at hand. Disappointing...

/Estel