View Single Post
Posts: 702 | Thanked: 2,059 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ UK
#164
Originally Posted by bluefoot View Post
* So like Jolla are offering their phone at a 'discount' in the Indian market, or how it is running at a 'discount' relative to its launch price in Europe? I don't see what your point is.
We were talking about *Apple* discounting.

Originally Posted by bluefoot View Post
* Sure, but it feels and looks painfully cheap and out-dated. The battery fit issues that plague the phone are fairly unprecedented, in my experience. As for the Motorola G, it's always been priced at and marketed as a budget phone, something the Jolla hasn't.
I disagree. It doesn't feel cheap and outdated. I love the design and it's plenty fast enough. I've never had any battery fit issues and many others haven't either. The price of the Jolla is more than you'd expect for the spec coming from a big company like Motorola looking to grab market share, but it's not by Motorola. Why are you surprised by this?

Originally Posted by bluefoot View Post
The loudest voices in the community shouting that low quality or hobby level specs / quality of manufacture are the best thing ever, and anything else is stupid, is hardly very productive.
Many people disagree that they are low quality or hobby level specs but in any case, what I'm trying to get across is that the specs aren't important. The reason to buy a Jolla isn't in the hardware specs. It's in the software and what it represents. If it's just about the hardware then by all means buy some cheap Chinese device with wonderful specs and Android - it'll be cheaper, have more features and an already established ecosystem.


Originally Posted by bluefoot View Post
People simply don't want to pay for devices that look bad, feel bad, are low specced, and uncompetitively priced on top of all of this, when they're already being asked to overlook the early state of the OS and lack of features and bugginess.
'Some' people do.


Originally Posted by bluefoot View Post
I know several active Linux enthusiasts who use it exclusively on PCs, develop Qt applications and who also laughed at what they thought was a "ghastly looking" phone, and on closer examination / playing with it labelled it a hobby device ... which it pretty much is at this stage.
That is IMHO encouraging if 'Linux enthusiasts' think it's "ghastly looking" but then I'm a Mac user and we have unalienable taste and style. Wouldn't it be awful if everyone had the same taste. I'm also quite happy with it being a work in progress. Sometimes I'll kvetch about how quickly that progress is but if you accept it's a work in progress you can either support that or not.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to aegis For This Useful Post: