View Single Post
Posts: 805 | Thanked: 1,605 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gdynia, Poland
#271
Originally Posted by malfunctioning View Post
Everything makes sense and is clear, except the objection misiak proposed (I actually thought about this before I even saw his response ).

It seems (at first sight, anyway) that the percentage of fresh swap remaining should be <= the total amount of swap space remaining reported by free.
I agree. My inequality was meant for already used swap, not remaining free swap I agree with you, because in the most optimistic scenario all free remaining swap is "fresh" (therefore flopswap fresh swap = free swap reported by free cmd), but if some of this swap is not fresh, then the amount reported by free cmd will be bigger then the amount of "fresh" swap (and it should never be possible to be lower I think).
 

The Following User Says Thank You to misiak For This Useful Post: