Yep, exactly.
I do also swapon2/swapoff1 only of course.

But swapped/flopped/moved is always (only) the currently used amount of swap memory (so maybe just 150MB or 200 or in my case max 450). But never more. So if I reduce the refresh actions I reduce the amount of write cycles on flash, right? [so your example with 200/day vs 700/3days do not match, afaiu]

Do not get me wrong, I like flopswap and want to help make it better from the beginning (I have no intention to release a third/fourth swap refresh tool )