View Single Post
pistachio's Avatar
Posts: 103 | Thanked: 114 times | Joined on Jun 2014 @ Knowhere
#9
Originally Posted by szopin View Post
on a more serious note, they could've upped it to 2037 without risking someone going over unix y2k problem accidentally (or y38 is the preffered name?), might need to wait a year and 19 days to see any averse effects
Yess, Y38 is more appropriate even stated by wikipedia. I was unaware of this problem. But found this article. Our N900 Is 32 bit, right?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pistachio For This Useful Post: