Thread: Jolla Tablet
View Single Post
benny1967's Avatar
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#360
Originally Posted by rcolistete View Post
The stretch goal announced in 27/11/2015 by Jolla cites MicroSDHC, not MicroSDXC
There is no such thing as SDHC >32GB. SDHC is defined by being <32GB and formated as FAT32. Whatever a Ext4-formated card >32GB is, it is certainly not SDHC.


Originally Posted by rcolistete View Post
You are twisting the facts and the numbers (votes).
... and you may want to count again. In said 'poll', the results were:

btrfs: 264
ExFAT from store: 199
f2fs: 123
ExFAT default: 113
Ext2/3/4: 89
XFS: 72
UDF: 58
FAT/FAT32: 18

Which makes:

ExFAT total: 312
btrfs: 264
f2fs: 123
Ext2/3/4: 89
XFS: 72
UDF: 58
FAT/FAZ32: 18

(Interesting, btw, that Jolla now goes for the solution that gathered roughly 10% of the total votes and this is sold to us as "listening to the community".)

The fact that ExFAT gained the most votes is even more relevant as the poll took ExFAT for granted and asked for additional file systems to support. (When one user wrote his answer in favor of ExFAT, he got rebuked by a moderator who wrote "You'll get ExFAT anyway, this question is about better support for open file systems.")

Originally Posted by rcolistete View Post
It is the active community that is visible. You and many here pro-exFAT could vote.
The question in the poll wasn't about having or not having ExFAT.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post: